Notice: Function _load_textdomain_just_in_time was called incorrectly. Translation loading for the cele domain was triggered too early. This is usually an indicator for some code in the plugin or theme running too early. Translations should be loaded at the init action or later. Please see Debugging in WordPress for more information. (This message was added in version 6.7.0.) in /home/hughmcguire/hughmcguire.net/wp-includes/functions.php on line 6121
neuronal connections – Hugh McGuire Press "Enter" to skip to content

neuronal connections

Published 2008-03-02 by Hugh

Says Gerald Edelman:

If we considered the number of possible neural circuits [in the human brain] we would be dealing with hyper-astronomical numbers: 10 followed by at least a million zeros. (There are 10 followed by 79 zeros, give or take a few, of particles in the known universe).

So there are roughly 12,500[10 followed by (1 million-79) zeros] times more neural circuits in a human brain than there are particles in the universe.

In a sense, books increase those neural circuits because one brain gets exposed to the neural connections in another brain. A library multiplies these connections again, and the web adds orders of magnitude more to the connections.

So: what happens next? I mean, what really happens? We’re just at the edge now.

Read more posts about science

4 Comments

  1. Coach Coach 2008-03-03

    “So there are roughly 12,500 times more neural circuits in a human brain than there are particles in the universe.”

    What a preposterous assertion. Where in the world does this wild-ass number come from??

  3. Hugh Hugh 2008-03-03

    @coach: it’s bad math following from the edelman statement above. if edelman is correct, the number of potential neural connections is much, much, much bigger in relation to particles than what I stated.

    potential neural connections/particles in the universe =

    10 followed by 1 million zeros
    divided by
    10 followed by 79 zeros
    =
    10 followed by (1 million-79) zeros

    note that, even according to edelman’s calcs, the number of potential neural connections probably does not outstrip the number of connections between particles in the universe (but i haven’t done the math).

    If you’d like to check out edelman’s work, the quote above appears in:

    GM Edelman and G Tononi. 2000. A universe of consciousness: How matter becomes imagination. New York: Basic Books.
    http://tinyurl.com/34jzp2

  4. Coach Coach 2008-03-03

    Chris and Hugh,

    Appreciate the links and I understand the theoretical math. There’s just something intuitively wrong here (and it may just be my “feeble” brain and its anthropomorphic bias). I need to dissect it a bit further. No argument that we have tremendous potential, but the scale suggested is bordering on bizarre. Anyway, thanks much for causing me to pause…for the cause

Comments are closed.