<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: does your candidate believe in open?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hughmcguire.net/2008/09/25/does-your-candidate-believe-in-open/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2008/09/25/does-your-candidate-believe-in-open/</link>
	<description>publishing, technology, media, philosophy, a bit of politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 06:17:14 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2008/09/25/does-your-candidate-believe-in-open/comment-page-1/#comment-7473</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 02:00:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/2008/09/25/does-your-candidate-believe-in-open/#comment-7473</guid>
		<description>yeah i think i agree, but i&#039;m not sure... though surely any MP&#039;s meetings are contained in an electronic calendar that should be easily exportable, and put-onlineable. so i don&#039;t imagine publishing the calendars will eat into their busy legislation-crafting time.

whether or not it&#039;s a good idea is another thing, but given the choice between knowing who my MP meets with and not knowing who he meets with, I will take the &quot;knowing.&quot; 

following from there, the question is: what is a reasonable set of guidelines, and can we build a good calendar system for all MPs that will publish easily to the web, so that their secretaries can press &quot;send&quot; and have the info public?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>yeah i think i agree, but i&#8217;m not sure&#8230; though surely any MP&#8217;s meetings are contained in an electronic calendar that should be easily exportable, and put-onlineable. so i don&#8217;t imagine publishing the calendars will eat into their busy legislation-crafting time.</p>
<p>whether or not it&#8217;s a good idea is another thing, but given the choice between knowing who my MP meets with and not knowing who he meets with, I will take the &#8220;knowing.&#8221; </p>
<p>following from there, the question is: what is a reasonable set of guidelines, and can we build a good calendar system for all MPs that will publish easily to the web, so that their secretaries can press &#8220;send&#8221; and have the info public?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven Mansour</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2008/09/25/does-your-candidate-believe-in-open/comment-page-1/#comment-7468</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven Mansour</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Sep 2008 00:35:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/2008/09/25/does-your-candidate-believe-in-open/#comment-7468</guid>
		<description>Most of the bullets points are reasonable, except for this one:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Publish the content of his or her daily schedule, including meetings with lobbyists and special interest groups.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

It&#039;s one thing to hold politicians accountable, it&#039;s another to expect them to write daily reports about &quot;what I did at work today&quot;. Politicians - yes, even elected officials - are human beings too, and we shouldn&#039;t need to babysit them if we did our homework on them before heading to the polls. Who thinks it&#039;s a good idea to create even &lt;strong&gt;more&lt;/strong&gt; bureaucracy? 

I would prefer to see the hour-or-so of time spent writing a daily schedule used elsewhere, like, I don&#039;t know, &lt;em&gt;actually working on legislation&lt;/em&gt; or something. 

Finally, there will always be the closed-door meetings and back-room sessions with interests groups and lobbyists. I&#039;m less interested in the existence of these meetings than in their outcome; if legislation I favor is pushed through, then I really don&#039;t care if it came as a result of a private meeting or a public consultation. 

Not everything needs to be open.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of the bullets points are reasonable, except for this one:</p>
<blockquote><p>Publish the content of his or her daily schedule, including meetings with lobbyists and special interest groups.</p></blockquote>
<p>It&#8217;s one thing to hold politicians accountable, it&#8217;s another to expect them to write daily reports about &#8220;what I did at work today&#8221;. Politicians &#8211; yes, even elected officials &#8211; are human beings too, and we shouldn&#8217;t need to babysit them if we did our homework on them before heading to the polls. Who thinks it&#8217;s a good idea to create even <strong>more</strong> bureaucracy? </p>
<p>I would prefer to see the hour-or-so of time spent writing a daily schedule used elsewhere, like, I don&#8217;t know, <em>actually working on legislation</em> or something. </p>
<p>Finally, there will always be the closed-door meetings and back-room sessions with interests groups and lobbyists. I&#8217;m less interested in the existence of these meetings than in their outcome; if legislation I favor is pushed through, then I really don&#8217;t care if it came as a result of a private meeting or a public consultation. </p>
<p>Not everything needs to be open.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
