<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: can the government just give it away?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hughmcguire.net/2007/10/09/can-the-government-just-give-it-away/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/10/09/can-the-government-just-give-it-away/</link>
	<description>publishing, technology, media, philosophy, a bit of politics.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 23:02:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/10/09/can-the-government-just-give-it-away/comment-page-1/#comment-1481</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Oct 2007 12:14:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/2007/10/09/can-the-government-just-give-it-away/#comment-1481</guid>
		<description>you might be right, but a few comments:

-there is no (significant) marginal cost, ie. giving away ten data sets is more or less equivalent to giving away 100 ... so while foreigners might not produce tex receipts for the UK gov&#039;t, their getting access to the data is not costing more. so it should not make a difference to the expenses/revenues balance

-the data in question will be almost exclusively data about Britain (maps, health data, enviro data etc) ... so while other countries *may* use this data, it&#039;s real utility is in Britain, so that&#039;s where one is likely to see the most innovation.

-and you *could* add reasonable restrictions to your licensing: free for UK residents, cost for others.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you might be right, but a few comments:</p>
<p>-there is no (significant) marginal cost, ie. giving away ten data sets is more or less equivalent to giving away 100 &#8230; so while foreigners might not produce tex receipts for the UK gov&#8217;t, their getting access to the data is not costing more. so it should not make a difference to the expenses/revenues balance</p>
<p>-the data in question will be almost exclusively data about Britain (maps, health data, enviro data etc) &#8230; so while other countries *may* use this data, it&#8217;s real utility is in Britain, so that&#8217;s where one is likely to see the most innovation.</p>
<p>-and you *could* add reasonable restrictions to your licensing: free for UK residents, cost for others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher Hughes</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/10/09/can-the-government-just-give-it-away/comment-page-1/#comment-1478</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Oct 2007 22:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/2007/10/09/can-the-government-just-give-it-away/#comment-1478</guid>
		<description>Great post. One tiny quibble - freeing the data to taxpayers, whose increased freedom raises more tax is one thing. But you would also be gifting an advantage to other countries (presuming the data would be free without restrictions), who would contribute no tax, and who might not do the favour in return.
Repeat - quibble. Great post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great post. One tiny quibble &#8211; freeing the data to taxpayers, whose increased freedom raises more tax is one thing. But you would also be gifting an advantage to other countries (presuming the data would be free without restrictions), who would contribute no tax, and who might not do the favour in return.<br />
Repeat &#8211; quibble. Great post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

