<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: How to Deal with Difficult People</title>
	<atom:link href="http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/</link>
	<description>at the intersection of technology, philosophy, and politics (and some other things).</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 06 Jan 2009 22:42:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.5</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: hughmcguire.net &#183; why do internet fights hurt me so?</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-1396</link>
		<dc:creator>hughmcguire.net &#183; why do internet fights hurt me so?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2007 13:48:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-1396</guid>
		<description>[...] people to stop being so &#8230; imflamatory. And I did lose my cool at one point and violated my How to Deal with Difficult People [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] people to stop being so &#8230; imflamatory. And I did lose my cool at one point and violated my How to Deal with Difficult People [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: I never knew &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flame Retards</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-605</link>
		<dc:creator>I never knew &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Flame Retards</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 May 2007 17:43:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-605</guid>
		<description>[...] Brevity and clarity are the most powerful tools in communications, and will save you many headaches.&#8212;How to Deal with Difficult People [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[&#8230;] Brevity and clarity are the most powerful tools in communications, and will save you many headaches.&#8212;How to Deal with Difficult People [&#8230;]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh Nursing</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-204</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh Nursing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 20:13:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-204</guid>
		<description>Every learning opportunity is a win :)

Congrats on moving to hughmcguire.net</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Every learning opportunity is a win :)</p>
<p>Congrats on moving to hughmcguire.net</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-172</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:47:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-172</guid>
		<description>josh: ok, let's call it a draw ;-)

boris: yeah right. he landed on his back just like always.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>josh: ok, let&#8217;s call it a draw ;-)</p>
<p>boris: yeah right. he landed on his back just like always.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boris</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-166</link>
		<dc:creator>Boris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 02 Apr 2007 18:11:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-166</guid>
		<description>Charlie Brown won.
;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Charlie Brown won.<br />
;)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-167</link>
		<dc:creator>Josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Apr 2007 21:35:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-167</guid>
		<description>Excellent advice, Hugh.

You wrote: "He won".

You learned something about yourself, understood that it would be better for you not to spend too much of your valuable time trying to 'win' an argument with people who are jerks, and significantly improved your own worldview.

You won, Hugh. Hands down.

That people don't see it on the Wikipedia discussion entry has no bearing at all.

Gnothi Seauton.

You won.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Excellent advice, Hugh.</p>
<p>You wrote: &#8220;He won&#8221;.</p>
<p>You learned something about yourself, understood that it would be better for you not to spend too much of your valuable time trying to &#8216;win&#8217; an argument with people who are jerks, and significantly improved your own worldview.</p>
<p>You won, Hugh. Hands down.</p>
<p>That people don&#8217;t see it on the Wikipedia discussion entry has no bearing at all.</p>
<p>Gnothi Seauton.</p>
<p>You won.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-168</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 21:29:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-168</guid>
		<description>there are two different cases: 

1. you are debating something substantive, and there are valid reasons to discuss one side or the other.

2. you have already exhausted substantive debate, and now the argument continues in cricles; or the interlocutor has been totally unreasonable from the start.

My advice if for when you have moved from 1 to 2. Unless you are unreasonable yourself, you will noticed when the discussion goes from 1 to 2. 

And this advice is directed to people who are reasonable to start with.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>there are two different cases: </p>
<p>1. you are debating something substantive, and there are valid reasons to discuss one side or the other.</p>
<p>2. you have already exhausted substantive debate, and now the argument continues in cricles; or the interlocutor has been totally unreasonable from the start.</p>
<p>My advice if for when you have moved from 1 to 2. Unless you are unreasonable yourself, you will noticed when the discussion goes from 1 to 2. </p>
<p>And this advice is directed to people who are reasonable to start with.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shawna</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-169</link>
		<dc:creator>Shawna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 17:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-169</guid>
		<description>very good advice.. will pass it on to others. I've heard of these irrational arguments going on for weeks causing grief galore... so much energy wasted!  

Perhaps, if the need to write a long-winded email explaining your argument exists, it's not so bad to write it all out if it helps to organize your thoughts.. I guess it depends on the complexity of the argument or how together your thoughts have been from the start, but then save it to drafts!  Wait a couple days.. read it again, and I find it becomes quite clear it's not worth sending. But sometimes it may have been worth writing ?  

I think sometimes we are proving / confirming something to ourselves when we feel that need to over explain. More beneficial to do as you say, send the "brief response" and end it.  Then delete that long winded version should it exist, reflect, learn.. move on. :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>very good advice.. will pass it on to others. I&#8217;ve heard of these irrational arguments going on for weeks causing grief galore&#8230; so much energy wasted!  </p>
<p>Perhaps, if the need to write a long-winded email explaining your argument exists, it&#8217;s not so bad to write it all out if it helps to organize your thoughts.. I guess it depends on the complexity of the argument or how together your thoughts have been from the start, but then save it to drafts!  Wait a couple days.. read it again, and I find it becomes quite clear it&#8217;s not worth sending. But sometimes it may have been worth writing ?  </p>
<p>I think sometimes we are proving / confirming something to ourselves when we feel that need to over explain. More beneficial to do as you say, send the &#8220;brief response&#8221; and end it.  Then delete that long winded version should it exist, reflect, learn.. move on. :)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hugh</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Hugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:59:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-170</guid>
		<description>definitely ... good-faith discussions/debates are good &#038; valuable... but when things just go on and on in circles, you have to realize that things aren't going to get resolved. a foot must be put down. better your foot than someone else's.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>definitely &#8230; good-faith discussions/debates are good &#038; valuable&#8230; but when things just go on and on in circles, you have to realize that things aren&#8217;t going to get resolved. a foot must be put down. better your foot than someone else&#8217;s.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reuben</title>
		<link>http://hughmcguire.net/2007/03/25/how-to-deal-with-difficult-people/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>reuben</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 25 Mar 2007 16:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://hughmcguire.net/?p=88#comment-171</guid>
		<description>solid advice, hugh.

I try to recognize when an argument is reason-based, and the person I'm arguing with is interested in arriving at the correct answer or some sort of solution, vs. emotion-based, when the interlocutor is interested in being right. It's of course a spectrum, but often, when you keep this dichotomy in mind, you will see when an argument has crossed the line of irrational no return, and that's when it's time to end it, in the way that you have suggested.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>solid advice, hugh.</p>
<p>I try to recognize when an argument is reason-based, and the person I&#8217;m arguing with is interested in arriving at the correct answer or some sort of solution, vs. emotion-based, when the interlocutor is interested in being right. It&#8217;s of course a spectrum, but often, when you keep this dichotomy in mind, you will see when an argument has crossed the line of irrational no return, and that&#8217;s when it&#8217;s time to end it, in the way that you have suggested.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
